0.00/0.05	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.07	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.15/0.38	% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
0.15/0.38	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.15/0.38	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.15/0.38	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.15/0.38	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.15/0.39	% CPULimit : 1440
0.15/0.39	% WCLimit  : 180
0.15/0.39	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 12:39:52 UTC 2026
0.15/0.39	% CPUTime  : 
0.15/0.39	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.19/0.47	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.24/0.58	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.7NAS7zrP0U/E---3.1_2417356.p
0.35/0.69	% Version: 3.5.1-ho
0.35/0.69	% Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSMNHFA.
0.35/0.69	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.35/0.69	% Starting full_lambda_6 with 720s (4) cores
0.35/0.69	% Starting additional_ho_6 with 180s (1) cores
0.35/0.69	% Starting new_ho_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.35/0.69	% Starting full_lambda_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.35/0.69	% Starting post_as_ho6 with 180s (1) cores
0.35/0.69	% additional_ho_6 with pid 2417370 completed with status 0
0.35/0.69	% Result found by additional_ho_6
0.35/0.69	% Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSMNHFA.
0.35/0.69	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.35/0.69	% Starting full_lambda_6 with 720s (4) cores
0.35/0.69	% Starting additional_ho_6 with 180s (1) cores
0.35/0.69	% (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4.0,,2,20000,1.0))
0.35/0.69	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4.0,,2,20000,1.0)
0.35/0.69	% Search class: HGHSM-FSLF31-MHFFFSBN
0.35/0.69	% partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM31-MHFFFSBN
0.35/0.69	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.35/0.69	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.35/0.69	% SubtermCWHack with pid 2417374 completed with status 0
0.35/0.69	% Result found by SubtermCWHack
0.35/0.69	% Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSMNHFA.
0.35/0.69	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.35/0.69	% Starting full_lambda_6 with 720s (4) cores
0.35/0.69	% Starting additional_ho_6 with 180s (1) cores
0.35/0.69	% (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4.0,,2,20000,1.0))
0.35/0.69	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4.0,,2,20000,1.0)
0.35/0.69	% Search class: HGHSM-FSLF31-MHFFFSBN
0.35/0.69	% partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM31-MHFFFSBN
0.35/0.69	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.35/0.69	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.35/0.69	% Preprocessing time       : 0.007 s
0.35/0.69	
0.35/0.69	% Proof found!
0.35/0.69	% SZS status Theorem
0.35/0.69	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.35/0.69	thf(decl_sort1, type, secrecy_Expression: $tType).
0.35/0.69	thf(decl_sort2, type, secrecy_KS: $tType).
0.35/0.69	thf(decl_sort3, type, secrecy_Secrets: $tType).
0.35/0.69	thf(decl_sort4, type, list_S529945141ession: $tType).
0.35/0.69	thf(decl_sort5, type, secrecy_specID: $tType).
0.35/0.69	thf(decl_34, type, knowle945212990e_know: secrecy_specID > secrecy_KS > $o).
0.35/0.69	thf(decl_35, type, knowle731562421_knows: secrecy_specID > list_S529945141ession > $o).
0.35/0.69	thf(decl_62, type, cons_S112077679ession: secrecy_Expression > list_S529945141ession > list_S529945141ession).
0.35/0.69	thf(decl_68, type, nil_Se901661471ession: list_S529945141ession).
0.35/0.69	thf(decl_123, type, secrecy_sE: secrecy_Secrets > secrecy_Expression).
0.35/0.69	thf(decl_124, type, secrec1016742679ession: secrecy_KS > secrecy_Expression).
0.35/0.69	thf(decl_126, type, secrecy_sKS: secrecy_Secrets > secrecy_KS).
0.35/0.69	thf(decl_138, type, a: secrecy_specID).
0.35/0.69	thf(decl_139, type, m: secrecy_Secrets).
0.35/0.69	thf(conj_0, conjecture, (knowle945212990e_know @ a @ (secrecy_sKS @ m)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.7NAS7zrP0U/E---3.1_2417356.p', conj_0)).
0.35/0.69	thf(fact_3_know1s, axiom, ![X182:secrecy_specID, X595:secrecy_Secrets]:(((knowle731562421_knows @ X182 @ (cons_S112077679ession @ (secrec1016742679ession @ (secrecy_sKS @ X595)) @ nil_Se901661471ession))<=>(knowle945212990e_know @ X182 @ (secrecy_sKS @ X595)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.7NAS7zrP0U/E---3.1_2417356.p', fact_3_know1s)).
0.35/0.69	thf(fact_7_KS2Expression_Osimps_I2_J, axiom, ![X647:secrecy_Secrets]:(((secrec1016742679ession @ (secrecy_sKS @ X647))=(secrecy_sE @ X647))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.7NAS7zrP0U/E---3.1_2417356.p', fact_7_KS2Expression_Osimps_I2_J)).
0.35/0.69	thf(fact_0_assms, axiom, (knowle731562421_knows @ a @ (cons_S112077679ession @ (secrecy_sE @ m) @ nil_Se901661471ession)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.7NAS7zrP0U/E---3.1_2417356.p', fact_0_assms)).
0.35/0.69	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ~((knowle945212990e_know @ a @ (secrecy_sKS @ m))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])).
0.35/0.69	thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X952:secrecy_specID, X953:secrecy_Secrets]:(((~(knowle731562421_knows @ X952 @ (cons_S112077679ession @ (secrec1016742679ession @ (secrecy_sKS @ X953)) @ nil_Se901661471ession))|(knowle945212990e_know @ X952 @ (secrecy_sKS @ X953)))&(~(knowle945212990e_know @ X952 @ (secrecy_sKS @ X953))|(knowle731562421_knows @ X952 @ (cons_S112077679ession @ (secrec1016742679ession @ (secrecy_sKS @ X953)) @ nil_Se901661471ession))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_3_know1s])])])).
0.35/0.69	thf(c_0_6, plain, ![X956:secrecy_Secrets]:(((secrec1016742679ession @ (secrecy_sKS @ X956))=(secrecy_sE @ X956))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_7_KS2Expression_Osimps_I2_J])).
0.35/0.69	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ~(knowle945212990e_know @ a @ (secrecy_sKS @ m)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.35/0.69	thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X119:secrecy_specID, X109:secrecy_Secrets]:(((knowle945212990e_know @ X119 @ (secrecy_sKS @ X109))|~((knowle731562421_knows @ X119 @ (cons_S112077679ession @ (secrec1016742679ession @ (secrecy_sKS @ X109)) @ nil_Se901661471ession))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.35/0.69	thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X109:secrecy_Secrets]:(((secrec1016742679ession @ (secrecy_sKS @ X109))=(secrecy_sE @ X109))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.35/0.69	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ~(knowle945212990e_know @ a @ (secrecy_sKS @ m)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.35/0.69	thf(c_0_11, plain, ![X119:secrecy_specID, X109:secrecy_Secrets]:(((knowle945212990e_know @ X119 @ (secrecy_sKS @ X109))|~((knowle731562421_knows @ X119 @ (cons_S112077679ession @ (secrecy_sE @ X109) @ nil_Se901661471ession))))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])).
0.35/0.69	thf(c_0_12, plain, (knowle731562421_knows @ a @ (cons_S112077679ession @ (secrecy_sE @ m) @ nil_Se901661471ession)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_0_assms])).
0.35/0.69	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ~((knowle945212990e_know @ a @ (secrecy_sKS @ m))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.35/0.69	thf(c_0_14, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12]), c_0_13]), ['proof']).
0.35/0.69	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.35/0.69	% Parsed axioms                        : 489
0.35/0.69	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 418
0.35/0.69	% Initial clauses                      : 149
0.35/0.69	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 6
0.35/0.69	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 143
0.35/0.69	% Processed clauses                    : 135
0.35/0.69	% ...of these trivial                  : 10
0.35/0.69	% ...subsumed                          : 43
0.35/0.69	% ...remaining for further processing  : 82
0.35/0.69	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 39
0.35/0.69	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.35/0.69	% Backward-subsumed                    : 2
0.35/0.69	% Backward-rewritten                   : 3
0.35/0.69	% Generated clauses                    : 186
0.35/0.69	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 107
0.35/0.69	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.35/0.69	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.35/0.69	% Paramodulations                      : 143
0.35/0.69	% Factorizations                       : 4
0.35/0.69	% NegExts                              : 0
0.35/0.69	% Equation resolutions                 : 46
0.35/0.69	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.35/0.69	% Total rewrite steps                  : 56
0.35/0.69	% ...of those cached                   : 37
0.35/0.69	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.35/0.69	%    Propositional check models        : 0
0.35/0.69	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.35/0.69	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.35/0.69	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.35/0.69	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.35/0.69	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.35/0.69	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.35/0.69	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.35/0.69	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.35/0.69	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.35/0.69	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.35/0.69	% Current number of processed clauses  : 64
0.35/0.69	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 15
0.35/0.69	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.35/0.69	%    Negative unit clauses             : 8
0.35/0.69	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 41
0.35/0.69	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 103
0.35/0.69	% ...number of literals in the above   : 359
0.35/0.69	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.35/0.69	% Current number of archived clauses   : 5
0.35/0.69	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 411
0.35/0.69	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 385
0.35/0.69	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 30
0.35/0.69	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 31
0.35/0.69	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.35/0.69	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
0.35/0.69	% BW rewrite match successes           : 3
0.35/0.69	% Condensation attempts                : 0
0.35/0.69	% Condensation successes               : 0
0.35/0.69	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 19997
0.35/0.69	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 7585
0.35/0.69	
0.35/0.69	% -------------------------------------------------
0.35/0.69	% User time                : 0.034 s
0.35/0.69	% System time              : 0.009 s
0.35/0.69	% Total time               : 0.043 s
0.35/0.69	% Maximum resident set size: 5464 pages
0.35/0.69	
0.35/0.69	% -------------------------------------------------
0.35/0.69	% User time                : 0.064 s
0.35/0.69	% System time              : 0.019 s
0.35/0.69	% Total time               : 0.082 s
0.35/0.69	% Maximum resident set size: 5888 pages
0.35/0.69	% E exiting
0.35/0.70	EOF